Quote:
Originally Posted by cgmv123
The configurations were considered by the team to be attachments. Their electrical board was considered to be the robot. An electrical board does not have locomotion or actuation capabilities.
Someone who knows more might be able to provide more context, but it seems like that definition was specifically in response to 1519's robot(s) from that year.
|
I think you're right. The parts that they were moving from one chassis to the other wouldn't qualify as a "ROBOT".
I know there was finally a definition of a ROBOT put into the rules following Overdrive. I congratulated Ken S - not too many teams get their own rule. The fact that FLL had a definition for at least 5 years prior to that ...
