View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-01-2014, 01:26
Iaquinto.Joe's Avatar
Iaquinto.Joe Iaquinto.Joe is offline
RPI 2018
AKA: Joe Iaquinto
FRC #0308 (The Monsters)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 166
Iaquinto.Joe is a jewel in the roughIaquinto.Joe is a jewel in the roughIaquinto.Joe is a jewel in the rough
Re: Standard for ball handoff?

So interfacing with an unknown robot with a potentially incompatible transmission device that requires both parties to remain adjacent and relatively motionless and high risk of entanglement/ damage to critical game piece manipulation devices in a location where both robots are free game for ramming and general defense is safer than setting the ball on the ground and driving away for the other team to acquire it? Best of luck to your team.

The last time any "Standardization" of devices was proposed was in 2011 with minibots and minibot deployments. Nobody used that and teams who had spare minibots needed to work around their alliance members to add the bot + deployment + code. This won't work until FRC reaches critical mass with collaborative efforts, at which it wasn't then and it isn't now.

Exchange balls over the common medium, the ground.
__________________
4 year 2011 - 2014 FRC team 308 member, Lead Programmer - C++ / LabVIEW

3 year 2011, 2013, 2014 OCCRA member, Co-Captain OCCRA team 308
  • OCCRA Engineering Excellence - Waterford Kettering 2013
  • Innovation in Control - 2011
  • Quality award- Northville 2012
  • Engineering Excellence- Howell 2014
  • Innovation in Controls- Livonia 2014

Last edited by Iaquinto.Joe : 06-01-2014 at 01:26. Reason: accidental slash
Reply With Quote