Thread: FIRST's statement on Einstein
View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2014, 22:52
Citrus Dad's Avatar
Citrus Dad Citrus Dad is offline
Business and Scouting Mentor
AKA: Richard McCann
FRC #1678 (Citrus Circuits)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: May 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Davis
Posts: 990
Citrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST's statement on Einstein
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay O'Donnell View Post
Is there any proof of this? If I remember correctly from FIRST's statement and team 548's statement that this was never said. Also, REALLY old thread revival.
I was correcting my earlier statement for the record that there was a problem with the bandwidth--that turned out not to be true, so my observation was incorrect.

What FIRST or Team 548 said officially doesn't mean that they covered all of the issues. I've discussed this directly with an individual who has direct knowledge and stated that the disruption began with 1717 and then moved on to Einstein.
Reply With Quote