Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill_B
He's got a lot on the ball and I think we can count on another notable robot from his team this year. However true this pseudo math homily may be, do you think it translates into other versions? Say maybe "better to be an 8 at one thing than a 4 at two things." Or "better to be an 9 at one thing than a 3 at 3 things." I mention this because there may be cases where a team cannot be a 10 at anything.
|
It does translate a little better with the context added of considering your resources when he uses that quote. Teams that have people, money, machining resources, and experience accrue "robot points" over time in a way, so when you come to the "robot store" you can cash them in for creating a number of core functionalities that meet higher and higher levels of quality as you have more points to spend. So yes, o na scale from 1-10, a team may only be able to do one thing at an 8/10 instead of a 10/10.