View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-01-2014, 16:10
Iaquinto.Joe's Avatar
Iaquinto.Joe Iaquinto.Joe is offline
RPI 2018
AKA: Joe Iaquinto
FRC #0308 (The Monsters)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 166
Iaquinto.Joe is a jewel in the roughIaquinto.Joe is a jewel in the roughIaquinto.Joe is a jewel in the rough
Re: Robot Oriented vs. field Oriented

We're using robot centric mecanum drive for now. The mecanum cartesian algorithm allows you to switch pretty easily so for us it's just driver preference. I like field centric better myself because it reduces complexity for the driver. I always explain it like you're sitting on the robot and holding onto the controls. Push left, go left. Push forwards, go forwards. That's robot centric. Field centric is when you're behind the glass and your robot is facing due east. Push forwards, robot moves away. Push left, goes left according to your frame of reference. One less thing for the driver to handle if they don't have to project their frame of reference onto the bot. Robot centric is probably more reliable over time though.
__________________
4 year 2011 - 2014 FRC team 308 member, Lead Programmer - C++ / LabVIEW

3 year 2011, 2013, 2014 OCCRA member, Co-Captain OCCRA team 308
  • OCCRA Engineering Excellence - Waterford Kettering 2013
  • Innovation in Control - 2011
  • Quality award- Northville 2012
  • Engineering Excellence- Howell 2014
  • Innovation in Controls- Livonia 2014