Thread: Puncher Shooter
View Single Post
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2014, 11:25
J.Warsoff's Avatar
J.Warsoff J.Warsoff is offline
BECAUSE SCIENCE
AKA: Jared Warsoff
FRC #1676 (The Pascack PI-oneers)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: New Jersey, currently Connecticut
Posts: 245
J.Warsoff has a reputation beyond reputeJ.Warsoff has a reputation beyond reputeJ.Warsoff has a reputation beyond reputeJ.Warsoff has a reputation beyond reputeJ.Warsoff has a reputation beyond reputeJ.Warsoff has a reputation beyond reputeJ.Warsoff has a reputation beyond reputeJ.Warsoff has a reputation beyond reputeJ.Warsoff has a reputation beyond reputeJ.Warsoff has a reputation beyond reputeJ.Warsoff has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Puncher Shooter

Our team tested both a puncher and catapult design (when I was home for break). Last time I checked, I believe that we found the catapult was more accurate and consistent (Someone from my team correct me if I am wrong, as I haven't been at the shop since last Saturday.)

From what I can tell, a puncher has a smaller area of contact than the catapult during the actual shooting process. Since it is applying a lot of force to a small area, it causes much more deformation in the ball than the catapult, which can lead to inconsistency in the shooting (due to even the smallest factors like amount of air in the ball, location of point of contact, etc.) Once again, someone correct me if my observations are wrong.
__________________


"I reject your reality, and substitute my own!" -Adam Savage

Check me out on Twitter or Facebook

Acoustical Engineering & Music major at the University of Hartford / Hartt School of Music Class of 2017
Reply With Quote