View Single Post
  #32   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2014, 15:45
markmcgary's Avatar
markmcgary markmcgary is offline
Software Mentor
FRC #4322 (Clockwork Oranges)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 174
markmcgary is just really nicemarkmcgary is just really nicemarkmcgary is just really nicemarkmcgary is just really nicemarkmcgary is just really nice
Re: Defence on the High Goal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madison View Post
For what it's worth, the Q&A you've linked to here -- 166 -- has no bearing on the legality or function of a spinning blocker.
I re-read your post and I agree with you. Said device is legal and would remain so unless and until future interaction with a ball caused it to deflect outside of the 6" cylinder. In order to comply with Q116, said device would have to be infinitely rigid to remain inside the 6" cylinder when reacting to the force of a impelled ball striking the device.