|
Re: Defence on the High Goal?
Quote:
Originally Posted by markmcgary
I re-read your post and I agree with you. Said device is legal and would remain so unless and until future interaction with a ball caused it to deflect outside of the 6" cylinder. In order to comply with Q116, said device would have to be infinitely rigid to remain inside the 6" cylinder when reacting to the force of a impelled ball striking the device.
|
Well, sufficiently rigid, not infinitely so. 
__________________
--Madison--
...down at the Ozdust!
Like a grand and miraculous spaceship, our planet has sailed through the universe of time. And for a brief moment, we have been among its many passengers.
|