View Single Post
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2014, 16:32
BigJ BigJ is offline
Registered User
AKA: Josh P.
FRC #1675 (Ultimate Protection Squad)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 945
BigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Defence on the High Goal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by inkling16 View Post
I feel like a spinning tall blocker that is hit by an incoming ball would not be considered "launching" the ball because "launching" requires "impelling a ball to a desired location or direction". I don't think that a freely spinning blocker that is hit by a ball meets this requirement.

Let's say that I am a goalie in a soccer game. I run around in a circle in front of the goal at a constant speed with my eyes closed. An opponent kicks the ball at the goal, and the ball bounces off of me. Would anyone say that I had "impelled the ball to a desired location or direction"? I certainly wouldn't.

Back to Aerial Assist. A tall blocker is spinning on top of a robot. A ball comes close to the blocker and bounces off at some arbitrary angle. The tall blocker is certainly in motion relative to the robot, but the goalie robot has not impelled the ball to a desired location or direction. Hence, this robot does not "launch" the ball and should not receive a penalty.
One could argue "away from the goal" is a desired direction.