View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-01-2014, 10:33
Dan.Tyler Dan.Tyler is offline
Registered User
FRC #2449 (Out of Orbit)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 72
Dan.Tyler has a spectacular aura aboutDan.Tyler has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckof13 View Post
If both cylinders do the same thing, then there is no need for two valves. Two valves in this case would be more complex, requiring more slots on the breakout, more wiring, and more code. Using on valve in this case also eliminates the chance that one cylinder doesn't actuate.
If you don't have a need for the two valves, you could likely do away with the second piston, too.

Saving more complexity, weight and money.


The comment about shifting gearboxes makes tons of sense though. That's definitely one where you want either both or neither to fail together, lest you drive in circles for eternity