View Single Post
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-01-2014, 11:21
martin417's Avatar
martin417 martin417 is offline
Opinionated old goat
AKA: Martin Wilson
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 721
martin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Materials not specifically allowed are now illegal?!?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by efoote868 View Post
Not sure how you can interpret that from anywhere in the rule. Figure 8-4 posts "example fastener system ...", and the verbiage of 21F is pretty clear about not being specifically defined:
I agree that the rules don't say this, but my point, which everyone seems to be missing, is that if we accept R21 as the basis for the GDC ruling that tape is not legal, then the only way that can be the basis is by saying that anything not explicitly listed in R21 is forbidden. There can be no other justification for R21 as the basis.
__________________
Former Mentor Team 1771
Former mentor Team 4509
Reply With Quote