Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJ
My initial guess is that an exception is being thrown by the declaration or use of something related to the analog input in code. Look up in the output from the "Robots don't quit" message and see if there is a stack trace or error message explaining what the problem is (and post it here if you can't figure it out  ). |
This is it
[cRIO] [Squawk VM] Version: 2011 FRC, Nov 5 2011, 14:34:13
[cRIO] FPGA Hardware GUID: 0x1394f6dc1feb42ec6910e5767ed1d22c
[cRIO] FPGA Software GUID: 0xa14c11bde4bb64aef6a86fc52a294cd9
[cRIO] edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.networktables2.server.Server ConnectionAdapter@8 entered connection state: GOT_CONNECTION_FROM_CLIENT
[cRIO] edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.networktables2.server.Server ConnectionAdapter@8 entered connection state: CONNECTED_TO_CLIENT
[cRIO] edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.util.AllocationException: Analog channel 8 on module 1 is already allocated
[cRIO] at edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.AnalogChannel.<init>(AnalogC hannel.java:68)
[cRIO] at edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.AnalogChannel.<init>(AnalogC hannel.java:49)
[cRIO] at edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.templates.subsystems.Basket. <clinit>(Basket.java:27)
[cRIO] in virtual method #109 of com.sun.squawk.Klass(bci=49)
[cRIO] in virtual method #106 of com.sun.squawk.Klass(bci=328)
[cRIO] in virtual method #105 of com.sun.squawk.Klass(bci=32)
[cRIO] in static method #25 of com.sun.squawk.VM(bci=4)
[cRIO] at edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.templates.commands.CommandBa se.<clinit>(CommandBase.java:20)
[cRIO] in virtual method #109 of com.sun.squawk.Klass(bci=49)
[cRIO] in virtual method #106 of com.sun.squawk.Klass(bci=328)
[cRIO] in virtual method #106 of com.sun.squawk.Klass(bci=156)
[cRIO] in virtual method #105 of com.sun.squawk.Klass(bci=32)
[cRIO] in static method #25 of com.sun.squawk.VM(bci=4)
[cRIO] at edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.templates.RobotTemplate.robo tInit(RobotTemplate.java:35)
[cRIO] at edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.IterativeRobot.startCompetit ion(IterativeRobot.java:72)
[cRIO] at edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.RobotBase.startApp(RobotBase .java:235)
[cRIO] in virtual method #10 of javax.microedition.midlet.MIDlet(bci=17)
[cRIO] at javax.microedition.midlet.MIDletTunnelImpl.callSta rtApp(64)
[cRIO] at com.sun.squawk.imp.MIDletMainWrapper.main(110)
[cRIO] in virtual method #95 of com.sun.squawk.Klass(bci=25)
[cRIO] at com.sun.squawk.Isolate.run(1506)
[cRIO] at java.lang.Thread.run(231)
[cRIO] in virtual method #47 of com.sun.squawk.VMThread(bci=42)
[cRIO] in static method #3 of com.sun.squawk.VM(bci=6)
[cRIO] java.lang.Error: ExceptionInInitializer: edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.templates.subsystems.Basket: edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.util.AllocationException: Analog channel 8 on module 1 is already allocated
[cRIO] in virtual method #106 of com.sun.squawk.Klass(bci=409)
[cRIO] in virtual method #105 of com.sun.squawk.Klass(bci=32)
[cRIO] in static method #25 of com.sun.squawk.VM(bci=4)
[cRIO] at edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.templates.commands.CommandBa se.<clinit>(CommandBase.java:20)
[cRIO] in virtual method #109 of com.sun.squawk.Klass(bci=49)
[cRIO] in virtual method #106 of com.sun.squawk.Klass(bci=328)
[cRIO] in virtual method #106 of com.sun.squawk.Klass(bci=156)
[cRIO] in virtual method #105 of com.sun.squawk.Klass(bci=32)
[cRIO] in static method #25 of com.sun.squawk.VM(bci=4)
[cRIO] at edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.templates.RobotTemplate.robo tInit(RobotTemplate.java:35)
[cRIO] at edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.IterativeRobot.startCompetit ion(IterativeRobot.java:72)
[cRIO] at edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.RobotBase.startApp(RobotBase .java:235)
[cRIO] in virtual method #10 of javax.microedition.midlet.MIDlet(bci=17)
[cRIO] at javax.microedition.midlet.MIDletTunnelImpl.callSta rtApp(64)
[cRIO] at com.sun.squawk.imp.MIDletMainWrapper.main(110)
[cRIO] in virtual method #95 of com.sun.squawk.Klass(bci=25)
[cRIO] at com.sun.squawk.Isolate.run(1506)
[cRIO] at java.lang.Thread.run(231)
[cRIO] in virtual method #47 of com.sun.squawk.VMThread(bci=42)
[cRIO] in static method #3 of com.sun.squawk.VM(bci=6)
[cRIO] WARNING: Robots don't quit!
[cRIO] ---> The startCompetition() method (or methods called by it) should have handled the exception above.
[cRIO] task 0xca7f88 (worker.0) deleted: errno=0 (0) status=0 (0)