View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-02-2014, 18:30
Carolyn_Grace's Avatar
Carolyn_Grace Carolyn_Grace is offline
Build bridges not walls.
AKA: Carolyn Beyer
FRC #1024
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 547
Carolyn_Grace has a reputation beyond reputeCarolyn_Grace has a reputation beyond reputeCarolyn_Grace has a reputation beyond reputeCarolyn_Grace has a reputation beyond reputeCarolyn_Grace has a reputation beyond reputeCarolyn_Grace has a reputation beyond reputeCarolyn_Grace has a reputation beyond reputeCarolyn_Grace has a reputation beyond reputeCarolyn_Grace has a reputation beyond reputeCarolyn_Grace has a reputation beyond reputeCarolyn_Grace has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Rookie Awards Ethics Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McLeod View Post
The easy way to tell if FIRST has been satisfied that the new team meets all the rookie criteria is the team number that they are assigned.

This year for instance, Rookies are only those teams with numbers 4900 and higher.
They are the only teams eligible for rookie awards.

New "veteran" teams, like 193 was last year (rookie #'s started at 4450 last year), are given new team numbers that are below this year's 4900, usually a never been assigned number that is close to any associated parent/sibling team number. None of these new teams are eligible for rookie awards of course.

This year we have 389 rookies eligible for awards and 10 new veteran teams not eligible for rookie awards.
Not eligible new teams:
265
746
1786
3134
3886
4413
5515
4416
4418
4524
This is really interesting. Thanks for sharing this information. Why is 5513 considered a non-rookie but has a higher number than 4900?
__________________
"It is change, continuing change, inevitable change, that is the dominant factor in society today. No sensible decision can be made any longer without taking into account not only the world as it is, but the world as it will be." -Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote