Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer26
One thing I don't really like about the weighted multi-year average is that teams of age < length of your stat rolloff are crippled because they have an aWAR of zero for the years before they existed.
In that case, I think their weighted average should not include the years they didn't exist. (this affects newer strong teams like 4001, 4334, 4814, 4451, 3990, etc)
|
I tend to agree with this, but they also have the advantage of winning rookie all star and rookie inspiration, which will boast their numbers. Teams that have won Chairmans at the championship also are disadvantaged.