View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-02-2014, 15:12
Racer26 Racer26 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Beaverton, ON
Posts: 2,229
Racer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 'Trivial' Posession allowed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Matteson View Post
The definitions of carrying and herding.

It comes down to whether or not an observer can tell which robot is in control of the ball.

In all three of those cases someone whatching the game will rightly believe that the first robot is still carrying or hearding by definition, which they are.

The caveats that the OP uses to say control are relinquished are not obervable by a referee in the flow of the game and nebulious at best. Also the first robot is clearly still carrying or herding in all the descriptions.

Therefore some one watching and scoring the game would rule that possesion has never changed.

Again it's pointless to argue this because the chances of 2 teams building robots to facillitate anything but option 1 and fairly low, and as I said before actually pulling that off would be tough.
Yeah, sure, but there is no rule that states or implies that two ROBOTs on the same ALLIANCE cannot be simultaneously in POSSESSION of the same BALL.
Reply With Quote