View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-02-2014, 16:27
Nuttyman54's Avatar
Nuttyman54 Nuttyman54 is offline
Mentor, Tactician
AKA: Evan "Numbers" Morrison
FRC #5803 (Apex Robotics) and FRC #0971 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Seattle, WA/Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,140
Nuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Nuttyman54
Re: 'Trivial' Posession allowed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jvriezen View Post
I'd maybe not go quite that far (which is why I had the multiple scenarios). In cases where the ball is safely gripped or cradled (3,4) does the second bot also satisfy the 'overt' and 'shielding' aspect that is seemingly required for a trap to be a POSSESSION ?
Sorry for the confusion, I didn't mean to imply that I think all of the presented scenarios qualify. I was simply trying to say that I agreed with Justin's interpretation that the rules allow for simultaneous possession by two robots.

It is still up to interpretation as to what actually qualifies as "trapping", but the rules regarding trapping seem to make it clear that multiple robots can possess the same ball at the same time in certain cases.
__________________
Reply With Quote