Thread: Week 1 Analysis
View Single Post
  #139   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2014, 14:05
MrBasse MrBasse is offline
Registered User
FRC #3572 (Wavelength)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Norton Shores, MI
Posts: 676
MrBasse has a reputation beyond reputeMrBasse has a reputation beyond reputeMrBasse has a reputation beyond reputeMrBasse has a reputation beyond reputeMrBasse has a reputation beyond reputeMrBasse has a reputation beyond reputeMrBasse has a reputation beyond reputeMrBasse has a reputation beyond reputeMrBasse has a reputation beyond reputeMrBasse has a reputation beyond reputeMrBasse has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Week 1 Analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madison View Post
..and also decided to provide teams with instructions to build a field element that was substantively different than the real field?

I don't buy it. If the bar knocking balls out of the goal was meant to be part of the 'fun', that characteristic of gameplay should be present in the low-cost field parts.
When was the last time a team field drawing matched the real field? I don't even want to think about trying to build a pyramid last year that came anywhere near what was at competition. Teams should understand this by now, and rookies should be mentored by teams that already know. This like when teams complained about discs bouncing out last year after they shot them into the goal at 100 MPH with 15000 RPM on the disc. FIRST changed their design for that, but I don't think they ever should have.

The field drawings have shown this potential since day one, if a team didn't address it in their game analysis they will face the consequences.

We might have problems with our high goal shot from a certain distance, but we have a range to shoot from if we find an issue. I think it is a great engineering challenge.
__________________
Andrew Basse
Coach - FRC Team 3572 - Wavelength
Reply With Quote