Thread: Week 1 Analysis
View Single Post
  #257   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-03-2014, 16:48
jlmcmchl jlmcmchl is offline
FF - The Breakfast Company
AKA: Jordan McMichael
FRC #0027 (Team RUSH 27)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Clarkston,MI
Posts: 327
jlmcmchl has much to be proud ofjlmcmchl has much to be proud ofjlmcmchl has much to be proud ofjlmcmchl has much to be proud ofjlmcmchl has much to be proud ofjlmcmchl has much to be proud ofjlmcmchl has much to be proud ofjlmcmchl has much to be proud of
Re: Week 1 Analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Line View Post
Thank you ether. Am I reading this correctly? Are rfpts and bfpts foul points, rhpts and bhpts hybrid (auto), and rtpts and btpts teleop?

If so, 25% of the points scored in the elims were fouls.
Also according to the data, only 3 match outcomes were decided by foul points.

#1, 7, 8. So, QF 1-1, 3-2 and 4-2.

Another note: .25 of red alliance's points were penalties (260 pts), while .29 of blue alliance's points were penalties (370 pts), almost 50% more penalty points than red recieved.

Additionally, the proportion of blue's penalty points to red's teleop/hybrid points is .47, and for the other alliance is .29. Higher-numbered alliances seem to have played much cleaner this week.
__________________


Field reset: Kettering Kickoff ('13, '14), Kettering ('14, '15), Bedford ('14), Woodhaven ('16), Carver ('16), Einstein! ('16)
Referee: Bedford ('15), MARC ('15, '16), Kettering Kickoff ('15, '16), Kettering District (#1&2: '16), Troy ('16)

Last edited by jlmcmchl : 02-03-2014 at 17:00. Reason: additional information
Reply With Quote