Quote:
Originally Posted by robotlover77
Admittedly I am new to FIRST. I was asked to watch a regional competition as a potential sponsor. It just so happened that this is the match that worked out logistically. I have however witnessed countless other competitive events in a host of fields on all levels. There is potential for bias in all competitive events and FIRST in no exception; to think otherwise is extremely naive.
The level of support you have for certain teams is impressive, however, nobody should be above review. Mistakes can be made regardless.
So are you saying that past FIRST events have been "fixed" ? Was it called into question and rectified? I would appreciate any honest feedback as I am trying to make a decision regarding team sponsorship and I in no way want to be affiliated with an organization that condones such behavior and dishonesty. The team appealing for my sponsorship painted a much different picture of FIRST.
|
As Nick mentioned, you're unfortunately missing context. The final rounds of the world championship in 2012 were sabotaged by (a now banned individual) interfering with robot communications.
FIRST is all based around "gracious professionalism" and a lot of the honor system. It is a touchy subject for a lot of people (for better or worse) whenever accusing a team or person of wrongdoings, even when they aren't Hall of Fame teams, storied volunteers, or "elite teams". I hope you have the opportunity to learn a little more of what we're about.
Next time, maybe ask around a little more before throwing accusations out, though
