View Single Post
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2014, 16:22
Navid Shafa Navid Shafa is offline
FIRST Hiatus/Retired?
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,525
Navid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond repute
Re: looking at OPR across events

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Hill View Post
I'd like to see an OPR justification for why 254 chose 973 and 2135 at CVR.
Although I appreciate and use OPR for forecasting and comparing teams, I would have to be stupid to use just OPR to pick an alliance. Any quantitative metric is going to put 973 at the bottom. How can you expect any quantitative system to account for robots that don't function properly or to their full potential in a large quantity of qualification matches?

I will continue to agree to disagree with your general premises. I will also continue to utilize the systems in place until someone provides a better quantitative metric substitute.
__________________
2015 & 2016 Fantasy FIRST Champions [Rotten Fruit Alliance]
Elgin Clock Award Winners: '13, '15, '16

Team 1983 | Alumnus, Former Mentor| Team_ 360 | Former Coach | Team 5803 | Former Mentor

"Once a Skunk, Always a Skunk"

Founding Member

Last edited by Navid Shafa : 10-03-2014 at 16:34.
Reply With Quote