View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-03-2014, 03:51
Answer42's Avatar
Answer42 Answer42 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Santa cruz
Posts: 110
Answer42 has much to be proud ofAnswer42 has much to be proud ofAnswer42 has much to be proud ofAnswer42 has much to be proud ofAnswer42 has much to be proud ofAnswer42 has much to be proud ofAnswer42 has much to be proud ofAnswer42 has much to be proud ofAnswer42 has much to be proud ofAnswer42 has much to be proud of
Re: Mt. Olive 2014 Footage and Match Length Issue

I'll add my 2 cents in here. I like this game. It's simple and to the point. It encourages elegant design, allows low level teams to make a useful robot, and can still be dominated by a team that builds a sufficiently amazing robot. Seeding is definitely weird, and not fair in the slightest due to the nature of the game. But with good scouting and communication between teams the right alliances end up forming anyways. And it's refreshing to see 1 picks 43 instead of 1 picks 2, 3 picks 4, ect. G40 was awful in week one, but reasonable now. Defense is huge, but I wouldn't say it's the meta-game. Both the the finals of CVR and IE were primarily offensive matches. So really. The only aspect that's disappointing to me here is that we're hearing about this mistake from a third party source. First should have addressed this publicly, and I hope we'll see a blog post soon explaining why it wasn't addressed.
__________________
My comments do not reflect the views of associated teams.
Reply With Quote