|
Re: Week3 cumulative Twitter stats & OPRs
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Zondag
Excerpt from the above post:
win foul points awarded:
20 average (mean)
220 max
lose foul points awarded:
5 average (mean)
110 max
The above is a very simple assessment of how the foul points affect this game. 4X as many foul points to the winning alliance....this means that fouls swing a large percentage of matches.
50 point foul is effectively a automatic loss most of the time.
Tragic.
Worst game design since 2003, yet no real action to correct....
Tragic.
|
Agreed. Quite sad to see some really good strategies play out and then that one tech foul swings it the other way.
I think a 30 point value should be the max assigned to the tech foul. Hopefully, based on average win/loss margins it will have a smaller swing effect on match outcomes.
__________________
2016 Newton SubDivision Finalists [254,1731,708]
2016 Waterloo Winners [610,3560]
2016 North Bay Winners [1310,2935]
2013 World Champions [1477,610]
2013 Galileo Division Champions [1477,610]
Last edited by Gaurav27 : 15-03-2014 at 11:31.
Reason: Added detail
|