Quote:
Originally Posted by billylo
78 - would like to see a change
27 - do not wish to implement a change
The detailed suggestions/reasons can be found in the link.
|
Where was the 'abstain' slot for those who have read it but do not have enough information one way or the other? What's the % error based upon your sample size? That pole is weak an inconclusive as-is.
The paper is interesting Jim, but I got the feeling that the last (and most important) page is just another rant for someone who is able to get on a loud soap box. Where are your actual suggestions? From everything else I've read that you put out, you're way smarter and more grounded than that.
Short term:
Decrease penalty points?
Add a safety zone?
Add a 2nd ball per alliance?
Increase value of assists?
Add a mid-tier penalty for mostly-inconsequential things? (After seeing 40's dirty plays in '08 Galileo elims, I believe intentionally possessing the other ball and/or tipping another robot should remain a big deal)
Long term:
Limit tractive drive train peak power to 1300W or speed to X ft/s?
Add a safety zone to every FRC game?
No more open fields?
Require full bumpers?
Remove the irrelevant autonomous rules?