Thread: Week 3 analysis
View Single Post
  #48   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2014, 17:02
AGPapa's Avatar
AGPapa AGPapa is offline
Registered User
AKA: Antonio Papa
FRC #5895
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Robbinsville, NJ
Posts: 324
AGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Week 3 analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr.Bot View Post
Perhaps some statistician can analyse the the strength of alliances based on rank vs. assist scores to prove or disprove my hypothesis.
I'm not a statistician, but this is what I found.

I looked at the results for all of the MAR and NE events (8 total) and found the sum of an alliance's Qualification Score, Assist Score, and Autonomous Score. I then ranked these by event from 1-8 (to standardize by event, 1 being highest, 8 being lowest). Alliances were also ranked by what order they picked.

For the winning alliances the averages were:
Pick rank: 3.5
QS rank: 2.625
Assist rank: 5.125
Auto rank: 3

These results make sense. The alliance with the highest total QS score wins most of the time. Out of these options the best predictor of an alliance winning in eliminations is how much they won in qualifications.

Obviously actual scouting would be better for picking than this.
Attached Files
File Type: xlsx Winning Alliance's Stats.xlsx (36.9 KB, 22 views)
__________________
Team 2590 Student [2011-2014]
Team 5684 Mentor [2015]
Team 5895 Mentor [2016-]
Reply With Quote