View Single Post
  #41   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-03-2014, 08:01
Siri's Avatar
Siri Siri is offline
Dare greatly
AKA: 1640 coach 2010-2014
FRC #2641 (PCCR; Refs & RIs)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,639
Siri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to Siri
Re: Destructive Air Tank Testing

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToddF View Post
That's why the uncalled G28 penalties are so upsetting. The risk with these tanks isn't that they will fail under normal circumstances. It's that they will fail when damaged by another robot. This is NEVER supposed to happen. It is against the rules to deliberately touch another robot inside their frame perimeter. If the tanks are mounted inside a robot's frame perimeter, they should be completely safe.
I'll abstain for the debate about how I'd like to see G28 called, but just as a note, your statement is not the rule: I've seen an entirely non-trivial number of alliance partners damage each other's robots. Moreover, legal bumper-bumper contact pushes many a robot into the side of low goal, the bars of which can you a number on many robots. Essentially, for teams to withstand expected legal damage, they still need to have their tanks relatively* well protected. Just something to remember.

*I do not know what that means specifically, which is why I'm reading this thread. Thanks 95!
__________________