View Single Post
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-03-2014, 17:44
DonRotolo's Avatar
DonRotolo DonRotolo is offline
Back to humble
FRC #0832
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 7,006
DonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Destructive Air Tank Testing

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToddF View Post
It's not just the air tanks that are a possible hazard. The batteries we use are just plastic boxes that contain acid.
We generally do not pressurize our batteries.

Yes, there are hazards in this sport, but some are more reasonable than others, and some can be mitigated better than others.

A standard white gym sock will do little to contain shrapnel from an air tank. These tanks are a definite danger and we need to work harder to identify an effective mitigation of the danger they represent.

A standard testing technique for burst is the Hydro-test, where a gas cylinder is filled with liquid (instead of gas) to test whether it will burst or not. 120 PSI of air is dangerous; 600 PSI of water is far less dangerous.

(Kids: Why would that be? )
__________________

I am N2IRZ - What's your callsign?