View Single Post
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-03-2014, 13:42
bduddy bduddy is offline
Registered User
FRC #0840 (ART)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: San Bruno, CA
Posts: 869
bduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Game Manual - Team UPDATE - 2014-03-18

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt_Boehm_329 View Post
So I'm a bit more confused now as to the difference between "deflecting" and one incidental hit. Deflecting seems to be an acceptable version of ball control from a defensive perspective due to the fact that there are goalie zones. (1 hit, intentionally trying to prevent the ball from going where it was originally going)

IndySam post #19 "Deliberately deflecting a ball to me is possession, even if it's one hit." under this then all defensive goalie bots are illegal. Why have goalie zones and increased height allowances if deflection is against the addition to G12 blue box?

But it now seems that this could fall into a 20 point foul.

Is one brief intentional hit on an opponents ball allowed as it falls under deflection covered in the blue box of G12?
The addition to the blue box seems to contradict the first part.

--I'll be back with an edit for related quotes and such
No, it's still not a foul. The main body of G12 still only penalizes POSSESSION, and deflecting a ball, regardless of how deliberate it is, is still not POSSESSION.
__________________

Does anyone else remember when TBA signatures actually worked?
Reply With Quote