View Single Post
  #174   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-03-2014, 03:19
Tristan Lall's Avatar
Tristan Lall Tristan Lall is offline
Registered User
FRC #0188 (Woburn Robotics)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 2,484
Tristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2014 Orlando Regional

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Sevcik View Post
I'll point out again what I think is a cogent change in the rules. In 2012, the Q&A specifically ruled against counterweight batteries. That year's battery rule had the clause "This is the only battery allowed on the Robot." Plus the same COTS computing exceptions. Which makes it pretty obvious that dead weight batteries aren't legal. That clause is missing in the 2013 and 2014 rules.

2013 had a single relevant Q&A: "Can we use more than one battery?" "No." Which is somewhat vague as to the use of said battery. As of Orlando, there were no relevant Q&As.

We're always reminded that this year's rules aren't last year's rules, and the omission of an obvious and clear prohibition against dead weight batteries really would make one wonder about the current feeling on the subject.
I find this logic convincing. There is (at present) no 2014 prohibition on multiple batteries not used for electrical power.

Besides, since there's no clear regulatory mandate, think of it from an equitable point of view: no harm, no foul, right? Who has reason to care if you use a (disconnected) battery or a rock as ballast?