View Single Post
  #83   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-03-2014, 06:51
Matt_Boehm_329 Matt_Boehm_329 is offline
Registered User
FRC #0329
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Long Island
Posts: 92
Matt_Boehm_329 has a spectacular aura aboutMatt_Boehm_329 has a spectacular aura about
Re: Unscheduled Team Update: 3-20-2014

Good! No penalty for contact between two appendages was a silly silly rule because I could easily see teams taking advantage of that loophole with the amount of rule lawyering that goes on.

Edit: To compare it to a sport, I assume it would be called like checking in hockey. Charging is called but regular checks not. In hockey its 3+ strides going into a check, here it may be crossing more than two zones or something. It also rules out a team building a "ball intake device" in name only and using it to damage other teams' ball intakes. The explicit allowance for penalty free impacts in g28 I felt was too confusing when preceded by g27

Last edited by Matt_Boehm_329 : 21-03-2014 at 07:00.
Reply With Quote