View Single Post
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-03-2014, 07:28
jwfoss jwfoss is offline
Chasing Elegant Simplicity
AKA: Justin Foss
FRC #0558 (Elm City Robo Squad)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 588
jwfoss has a reputation beyond reputejwfoss has a reputation beyond reputejwfoss has a reputation beyond reputejwfoss has a reputation beyond reputejwfoss has a reputation beyond reputejwfoss has a reputation beyond reputejwfoss has a reputation beyond reputejwfoss has a reputation beyond reputejwfoss has a reputation beyond reputejwfoss has a reputation beyond reputejwfoss has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Pistons not extending fast enough?

Quote:
Originally Posted by s_forbes View Post
The only other big trick is to use a high-flow solenoid valve; we are using McMaster part number 6124K511 to feed each of our pistons. The valves you get from AndyMark or Vexpro flow about 3x less air (these were the maximum flow rate that we could use in the past... this year's rule set has allowed us to use a much larger variety of solenoids).

The geometry of the arm also plays a big role. Based on the videos you posted, I would extend the length of the platform that is shooting the ball, and move the piston locations on the base mounting board back about 0.5"-1" from the pivot location to allow it to sit "flatter" before firing. These pivot locations will all probably need a bit of adjustment as you continue testing.

Oh, and if you can get rid of the miles and miles of tubing between your pneumatics testing board and the catapult, you will probably see an immediate improvement.


EDIT: as far as gravity returning the catapult arm to the starting position, we have never had any trouble with this. It falls right back into place with ease.
We have found similar results with McMaster 6425k11

There are a large number of teams successfully launching with various length 1.5" Bores, with a single solenoid on each of the cylinders "extend" side and no valve on the "retract" side.

You may want to take a look at the geometry of 842, 624, or 2587.
__________________
2003-2006 | FRC 0176 | Aces High - Student
2007-2010 | FRC 0229 | Division by Zero - Mentor in Training
2011-2013 | FRC 2168 | Aluminum Falcons - Mechanical Mentor
2013-20xx | FRC 0558 | Elm City Robo Squad - Mechanical Mentor

Last edited by jwfoss : 21-03-2014 at 07:34.