View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-03-2014, 23:51
GBilletdeaux930's Avatar
GBilletdeaux930 GBilletdeaux930 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Greg
FRC #0930 (Mukwonago Bears)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Milwaukee,Wisconsin
Posts: 171
GBilletdeaux930 is a name known to allGBilletdeaux930 is a name known to allGBilletdeaux930 is a name known to allGBilletdeaux930 is a name known to allGBilletdeaux930 is a name known to allGBilletdeaux930 is a name known to all
Re: Winningest Strategies Data from the Montreal Regional

Quote:
Originally Posted by DampRobot View Post
Super fascinating. Is there any brilliant OPR/Stats/FMS Twitter expert that can figure out a way to compile these kinds of statistics from the FMS twitter data?
@FRCFMS only gives us Match Final Score, Auton Points, Tele Points, Foul points. We get no sense of what those tele points consist of (truss/catch/assist).

Team standings give us Total Assist, Auto, Truss/Catch, and Goal/Foul points. But these are summed up across all matches.

To get CLOSE to compiling strategies, we would need to pull the Team Standings after each match to get the updated details that FMS doesn't provide us to infer how much of the Tele Points FMS told us about were Truss/Catch points and how many were assists. Thus, we, unfortunately, cannot retroactively compute them to my understanding.

One thing to think about is that this game isn't 2 alliances playing on the same field together like many games in previous years. There is enough active defense where this game is, very clearly, 2 alliances playing against each other. Each ones' strategy directly effects the outcome of the other. Therefore, it's hard to tell which strategies are executed by teams who can effectively evade defense, and those that cannot. That team who can weave through a field is naturally going to be able to perform any offensive strategy better than the team who gets stuck at every robot. Just something to consider when looking at this data.