View Single Post
  #69   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-03-2014, 00:18
falconmaster's Avatar
falconmaster falconmaster is offline
Registered User
AKA: Ledge
FRC #0842 (Falcon Robotics)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 1,406
falconmaster has a reputation beyond reputefalconmaster has a reputation beyond reputefalconmaster has a reputation beyond reputefalconmaster has a reputation beyond reputefalconmaster has a reputation beyond reputefalconmaster has a reputation beyond reputefalconmaster has a reputation beyond reputefalconmaster has a reputation beyond reputefalconmaster has a reputation beyond reputefalconmaster has a reputation beyond reputefalconmaster has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to falconmaster
Re: 301 points! and could have done more

Quote:
Originally Posted by Answer42 View Post
So, this was said earlier, but I didn't see it addressed. Why not just get a foul and raise the opposing alliances score? If you are serious enough to go no defense then why not give the other alliance the points they need "accidentally" when it was clear you had a 100+ point lead on them? that would be what baffles me most about this situation.
It wasn't the money, it was the challenge. Fouls would not be the GP way to get to the goal that Steve Sanghi wanted. He wanted to see us play the game as fast as we could with co-opertition. Getting fouls would not be in the spirit that the challenge was made.
__________________
Faridodin "Fredi" Lajvardi KD7WKD
Reply With Quote