Quote:
Originally Posted by Zebra_Fact_Man
Many of the complaints to this year's game regarding rules are very reminiscent of sports to me. For instance, whether a pass interference will be offensive or defensive can sometimes be entirely up to the referee calling the play, and we all know how an umpire can skew the results of a baseball game by a simple safe/out call. Or in basketball whether or not something is a foul or whether or not it is a flagrant foul; subjective to the collective referee crew.
Do we always agree with the calls? No. But upon, further consideration, I honestly don't believe there is much that could be done to improve the current rules we have without the degrading the integrity of the game (maybe lessening a few individual penalty values from 50 to 20ish, but only a few if any).
|
I see your point, but in basketball, 20% of the matches teams play are NOT decided by fouls. By the amount of drama that's been rising at at least one regional every week, there is clearly a problem that needs to be addressed.