|
Re: 301 points! and could have done more
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOtherGuy
The blue alliance did BETTER in the second match than in the first. How did they NOT play to the best of their ability?
|
Like many things in FIRST the process is important. I have no problem with an alliance that decides their best chance at winning is pure offence. I don't agree with the practice of making arrangements with opponents to achieve a secondary objective. The scores were much higher but the change in point differential between matches was 3.
You are allowed to disagree but the success of Cory's team is no reason to dismiss his opinion.
__________________
Queen's Applied Science '13, Applied Mathematics
|