View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-03-2014, 02:30
bduddy bduddy is offline
Registered User
FRC #0840 (ART)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: San Bruno, CA
Posts: 869
bduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 301 points! and could have done more

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gemmendorfer View Post
This isn't fully related to the ethics questions going on in the thread, and was just an observation from a side station as human player, but I am pretty sure the lack of hard ramming was partially due to the Head Ref making sure the drivers understood the new ramming rules (the update to G27 on the 20th), and how they were going to call it.

I remember just in a practice match, 812's bot hit ours at mediocre speed (they were going just fast enough that when they hit us, they tipped a small, but our bot didn't really move much), and it was still called a ramming foul.

Pretty much just think you didn't see the heavy ramming in large part due to drivers definitely not wanting to get that foul.

(Just an observation)
That... doesn't sound anything like the new ramming rule?

But really, this discussion should take place somewhere else...
__________________

Does anyone else remember when TBA signatures actually worked?
Reply With Quote