[221Sarahborg]

I haven't gotten to reading other opinions of the game, but some of the points that the original post I agree with and others I don't.

Saying the game is worse than the 2003 game, I just watched the video for the game, Stack Attack, which seems bad in it's own ways. This game has it's own issues, I can easily complain about with how big the defense seems to be in my own opinion. I could easily go on about the pros and cons at this game, compared to my interest in last year's.

With fouls being the contenders, I can agree that there are matches that have seen that just because of a single human player error an alliance has last the match, I have been on both sides of those matches. There's been matches where I've seen over 100 foul points have been added to matches and have made drastic changes to outcomes of matches and rankings.

I agree to the original post when it says that that's a part of having a good outcome is to input your alliance members that might be new or having a rough year to their best abilities and to use them to your advantage as defense or this year even as a robot that is for intake and the first assist. That's the big part of having Assisting as a large part of your alliance in winning with assists helping your score (and your ranking).

This game certainly has a lot of ups and downs with how it was played and scored, my personal opinion is that it could be better and the way the single game piece and fouls we used made it not as enjoyable as I think it could have been, and the rules for certain parts of competition could be improved as always I could see improvements in the ways things work in FIRST. Sadly my team's competition time in Aerial Assist is done until our off-season next school year.