Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanis
I wouldn't call that just a graze.
|
cf. G10 and Sections 2.1 and 2.2.1. Certainly an appropriate action and certainly not appropriate for a G10.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanis
The other problem here seems to be that the drivers didn't notice the gate had come off. If they had seen that, they could have gone to the other goal to put the ball in.
|
We all saw the gate come off, but no one was positive where it had landed on or off the field until we were stuck. I feel we shouldn't be looking out for all possible, invisible obstacles not described in the field spec, rather than focusing on playing the game.
Watch the video again, this time from
1:53. The bot pulls up to the ball, picks it up, and comes to a stop next to the gate. Then, in executing a pretty reasonable turn to face the goal, the corner snags the panel. It appears as if the velcro is not even attached in this case, since it immediately slides directly to the side (I doubt the velcro would shear like that from a bumper corner). It slides a foot or so before hitting the human player barrier and flipping onto the field.
When one robot breaks another, a foul is assessed for the damage. When one robot breaks itself, a foul may be assessed for violating other robot rules or leaving parts on the field that may become a hazard to other robots. When a robot breaks the field, a foul is assessed. But when the field breaks a robot, it's just "unfortunate."