Thread: G-29?
View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2014, 19:32
rich2202 rich2202 is offline
Registered User
FRC #2202 (BEAST Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,191
rich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: G-29?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronnie314 View Post
That team then pushed us into the previous team we were defending before the "grace period" was up and they couldn't get away.
One could argue that G14 (Strategies aimed solely at forcing the opposing ALLIANCE to violate a rule are not in the spirit of FRC and are not allowed. Rule violations forced in this manner will not result in assessment of a penalty on the target ALLIANCE.) would apply.

I think there are situations that are "unintentional", so the G14 exception would keep you from being penalized, but not intentional enough for the opposing team to get a G14 violation. In other words, both the G14 and G29 violations are waived.

Note: In the G29 defintion: " Pinning is transitive through other objects." Thus, it could be argued that the Team pinned itself through you, and you were the transitive object, and not the pinning object.
Reply With Quote