View Single Post
  #57   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-04-2014, 19:42
Tristan Lall's Avatar
Tristan Lall Tristan Lall is offline
Registered User
FRC #0188 (Woburn Robotics)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 2,484
Tristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Orlando Incident

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve W View Post
I felt really bad for the alliance partners and 1 team was involved with both DQ's. I read and re-read the rules and next morning (Saturday) I spoke with the FTA and Head Ref. I requested a ruling from HQ on the DQ's to the 4 teams not in violation of the rules. I pleaded my case to the FTA who took it to HQ. Final ruling, only the robots that had made the modifications got a Red Card and the other robots got their points back.
Was FIRST's ruling that T6 applied only to initial inspections leading to the reciept of a valid inspection sticker, and not subsequent ones? (That makes sense from an equitable point of view, because there really isn't any good way for partners to be sure of the inspection status of another robot other than to look for a sticker indicating that it had, at one point, passed.)

And if so, did they publish a version of that ruling in the Q&A or in an update?
Reply With Quote