View Single Post
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-04-2014, 20:40
mschwab013's Avatar
mschwab013 mschwab013 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Matt Schwabenbauer
FRC #0291
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 88
mschwab013 is a name known to allmschwab013 is a name known to allmschwab013 is a name known to allmschwab013 is a name known to allmschwab013 is a name known to allmschwab013 is a name known to all
Re: Should teams be allowed to decline a replay?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JB987 View Post
We learned at Champs the hard way last year that we need to have a member of the drive team hang around the question box through at least the match following the one we just completed...every time and maybe to remind the head ref and FTA that a replay due to a field fault should only take place if the outcome of the match is affected, not because an opponent's ranking was lowered due to loss of a few autonomous points...or any other hypothetical issue that may arise.
Agreed. I was a driver in this match and was shocked to learn that the replay request was approved because the outcome was not affected
__________________


2013 Pittsburgh- Gracious Professionalism award, 7th seed, 6th alliance captian, quarter-finalist(291,3492,4601)
2013 Queen CIty- Chairman's Award, 39th seed
2012 Pittsburgh- 23rd seed
2012 Buckeye- 34th seed, 2nd alliance, quarter-finalist(291,1241,4085)
2011 Pittsburgh- 13th seed, 5th alliance, quarter-finalist(291,337,3504)
2011 Buckeye- 18th seed, 8th alliance, quarter-finalist(279,291,3496)
2010 Finger Lakes- 15th seed, 5th alliance, quarter-finalist(291,1507,1559)
2010 Buckeye- Chairman's Award, Imagery Award, Quality Award, 4th seed, 1st pick, 1st alliance, semi-finalist(291,1014,1629)
Reply With Quote