Thread: Swerve drives
View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-04-2014, 02:06
Bryce2471's Avatar
Bryce2471 Bryce2471 is offline
Alumnus
AKA: Bryce Croucher
FRC #2471 (Team Mean Machine)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 424
Bryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud of
Re: Swerve drives

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gdeaver View Post
Ok, for the teams that did swerve for the first time this year, was it worth it. Do you feel that it gave you a competitive advantage?
Yes,

We did some off-season development of swerve drives, and we were very glad that we did. We already had the code nailed down, and enough swerves for the practice bot, so we just adjusted the design slightly, and pumped out six more for the comp bot. They have had great performance overall, and have had no mechanical failures!(knocks on wood)
One thing we have been displeased with is the optical encoders. The ones we use have an index pulse, but can still get off by a significant amount for a noticeable portion of the match. Unless we stop to run a homing routine.
We are testing magnipot absolute encoders from Digi-Key on the practice bot and we will probably be changing out the comp bot's encoders for them at champs.
__________________
FLL Team Future imagineers
2010 Oregon State Championships: Winners
2011 International Invite: First place Robot design, Second Place Robot Performance
FRC Team Mean Machine
2012 Seattle: Winning alliance
2013 Portland: Winning alliance
2013 Spokane: Winning alliance
2014 Wilsonville: Winning alliance
2014 Worlds: Deans List Winner