View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-04-2014, 22:12
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,044
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FMS Scouting Explained

Quote:
OPR: This is typically just the average match score from all of one team’s matches. For FMS Scouting, 4 of the 6 values will be Blue Auto, Red Auto, Blue TeleOp, and Red TeleOp scores. When averaging all of these values based on every time a specific team appears on the field, it would produce the traditional idea of OPR. With this new form of OPR, the traditional OPR must be divided by 3 to show that team’s specific contribution.
I've tried reading this several times, and it sounds like you're saying that OPR as commonly used here on CD ("traditional") is just a simple average, and that your new form of OPR is derived from that simply by dividing the "traditional" OPR by 3.

That's not really what you intended, is it?


Reply With Quote