View Single Post
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-04-2014, 12:44
bduddy bduddy is offline
Registered User
FRC #0840 (ART)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: San Bruno, CA
Posts: 869
bduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Suggestion for a new overall approach

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pault View Post
But what incentives would this actually give teams? It is J̶u̶s̶t̶ a̶s̶ more likely that the team you are helping is going to be against you as it is that they are going to be on your alliance. If I magically made everybody in New England 10x better except for my own team, we would have a much harder time, regardless of the game.
It decreases your variance. Let's say that you have a very good robot, better than all of the other teams at your regional. If all of the other teams were at a roughly similar level, you would expect to win every match. However, if some of the other teams were OK and some were very bad, you could lose some matches due to the randomness of the alliance selection algorithm. Of course, this affects everyone equally, but if you have a good robot you want to remove this randomness.
__________________

Does anyone else remember when TBA signatures actually worked?