[EricH]

Originally Posted by Daniel_LaFleur

One persons innovative approach is another persons 'violation of the spirit of the rule'.

Sorry, I prefer my rules to be explicit, and not interpreted.

To be fair, the rules were pretty clear (another thing certain folks need to work on), and if there was a question of intent/spirit, you asked the rules committee directly (and knew who they were!) and publicly, and got the same type of response back, usually within a day or so unless it was a particularly complicated one or you were being difficult. None of this "We cannot perform design reviews" non-answer (or "See the definition of possession"--which is what I just asked about!).