View Single Post
  #55   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 15:57
TheKeeg's Avatar
TheKeeg TheKeeg is offline
Michigan Tech Engineering
AKA: Keegan Harrington
FRC #0068 (Truck Town Thunder)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Ortonville, Michigan
Posts: 77
TheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud of
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MechEng83 View Post
No.

All you posters speaking platitudes about "depth of strategy" must not have had a schedule with half your matches filled with teams who couldn't drive forward in auto, couldn't collect the ball, couldn't adhere to a plan, couldn't NOT foul, and couldn't stay connected to the field. How do you raise the floor of competition when you have alliance partners who don't even bother showing up for matches?

tl;dr - UA >> AA
So having a different game would change this? There will always be robots that are not exactly capable, but that does not mean it is a bad game. Ultimate Ascent could be won by 1 dominant robot which makes the powerhouse teams happy but it is no fun for the rookies and less experienced teams. How would having a different game change the fact that some teams cannot program an auto?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkbot View Post
I didn't like this game at all, the most fun i had in the drivers station was on the practice field at world with 8 balls on the field. Just because there was more possibility to make a strategy doesn't mean it was a better game.
So what do you define as a good game?
__________________

Keegan Harrington
Truck Town Thunder
2013-2014: Mechanical Design

"Infinity: you empty out all of the coffee and there is still more orange juice"
Reply With Quote