Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKeeg
So having a different game would change this? There will always be robots that are not exactly capable, but that does not mean it is a bad game. Ultimate Ascent could be won by 1 dominant robot which makes the powerhouse teams happy but it is no fun for the rookies and less experienced teams. How would having a different game change the fact that some teams cannot program an auto?
|
Because UA and AA are so vastly different in the way that seeding affects outcome.
Many rookie and inexperienced teams still contributed nothing to the alliance in AA, and brought down their partners instead. At least in UA, they weren't holding back partners.
In UA the better robots usually won because there was little to no interaction amongst teammates. A powerhouse could overcome having two inexperienced partners and the better team won.
In AA, better robots could lose because they had two boxes on wheels with them due to random seeding.
You're implying AA is better because powerhouse teams got punished for no reason, and I just can't understand how anyone could support that.