View Single Post
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 16:22
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,116
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Was Aerial Assist Better than Ultimate Ascent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnSchneider View Post
Better meaning that in UA, a team whose robot could consistently score higher than all 3 opponent robots combined could win regardless of partners.
So? Why is it necessarily a bad thing to have a game in which it's not possible to build a robot that can outscore three competent opponents on its own?

For consideration, the extreme of this line of thinking is "all games should have chokehold strategies," which is clearly nonsense.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016
Reply With Quote