Thread: Aerial Assist Unpenalized High Score: 370 by 51, 2485, and 1918 (with help from 781)
View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2014, 21:47
Mk.32's Avatar
Mk.32 Mk.32 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Mark
FRC #2485 (W.A.R. Lords)
Team Role: Engineer
  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 770
Mk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud of
Re: Aerial Assist Unpenalized High Score: 370 by 51, 2485, and 1918 (with help from 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by David8696 View Post
Yup. As you can see, they got stuck on the truss, which by definition means they're >60": a 20-pt foul.
To be clear this is incorrect. The foul was from 399 "high speed" ramming 1918. A rule update came out during one of weeks, that made certain forms of "ramming" a foul.....

As a inspector I can say with confidence 2056 was NOT taller then 60in but pretty close. They were hit or something that caused the robot to tilt up and hit the truss, now per QA if unintentional this is legal.
__________________
Engineering mentor: Team 2485: WARLords 2013-

Team President: Team 3647 2010-2013
Last edited by Mk.32 : 28-04-2014 at 21:58. Reason: Clarity
Reply With Quote