View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2014, 00:04
Nick.kremer's Avatar
Nick.kremer Nick.kremer is offline
Registered User
FRC #3512 (Spartatroniks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Santa Maria
Posts: 52
Nick.kremer is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: CAD vs SolidWorks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madison View Post
CAD is an acronym that describes a type of software. Perhaps you mean AutoCAD, a particular CAD product?
I cant speak for O.P. but I think this is what they meant.

In any case I will weigh in on Autocad vs. SolidWorks.

Autocad:

In my opinion, if you are new to CAD this is the way to go. Students should get a good handle on 2-D visualization of parts, and the basic drafting techniques before moving on to 3-D parts and assemblies. Similarly, they will be dimensioning in 2-D (for any CAD program), so I believe introducing them to dimensioning initially is better in 2-D.

SolidWorks:

Solidworks is of course much better for assemblies, and visualizing the overall size of a bot, and how parts interact with each-other. You can weld parts together, limit how they move, and this really helps the design process to make sure appendages both fit in frame perimeter, but extend out the proper distance.
My problem with SolidWorks (for students who start learning CAD with it) is that it automatically generates 2-D views for you when you make drawings from assemblies, which does save time, but limits the amount of time students think about how the part looks. It also seems that dimensioning becomes almost an afterthought, which should never be the case.
__________________
Check out Team 3512's Website!

Like us on Facebook!
Reply With Quote