View Single Post
  #135   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2014, 15:26
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Joining the 900 Meme Team
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,082
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2014 Lessons Learned: The Negative

Quote:
Originally Posted by rsisk View Post
That would be awesome, but how to implement feedback for all teams is beyond me. The best way, and this is happening in some today, is peer review of Chairman's Submissions and sharing of judging tips.
I'm going to come out and say that it is impossible without drastic changes to the process. It's doable in FLL due to the nature of their judging process. For those who don't know the FLL process is a rubric based score sheet with a section for general comments. (Much like the Chairman's Award) it means that teams know how well they did and can iterate from there.

Now, do I think FRC Judging should go to a rubric system and provide it as feedback to teams? I'm not sure. There are benefits and drawbacks to a rubric system.
__________________




.
Reply With Quote